Aeroturbine by Aerotecture are being called the future of urban wind energy. Despite of this positive reputation of Aeroturbine many are arguing that the asking price by Aerotecture is a too high. Assuming that one could get 5 KWH per day out of the 1KW 510V model of Aeroturbine and assuming that the value of the KWH is $0.12/KWH, yearly income equivalent would be;
365days/yr x 5KWH/day x $0.12/KWH = $219/year
Therefore payback time in years would be
$15,000/($219/yr) = 68.5 years
Even if you could get 10 kWH per day (which is doubtful because where are you going to have wind blowing at 30mph 10 hours/day), the payback for Aeroturbine would still be about 35 years. However, Bill Becker’s Aeroturbine its self would probably breakdown long before that.
Being a strong supporter of green energy, the cost of Aeroturbine does not disturb me, but Aerotecture should consider a more sensible pricing for Aeroturbine as green technology should be consumer friendly and so that its implementation can be wide spread. Aeroturbine its self is not an expansive set of equipment, in fact it’s simple and cheaper in terms of manicuring compared to the regular wind turbines. Aeroturbine is a light weight easy to install low thought regular yield equipment that should be sold in bulks on more retail grounds.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Aeroturbine free energy or a cost disaster
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- June (2)
- May (1)
- November (2)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- March (2)
- February (10)
- January (1)
- December (5)
- November (11)
- July (6)
- June (42)
- May (8)
- April (19)
- March (6)
- February (15)
- January (4)
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (9)
- June (6)
- May (5)
- April (6)
- March (2)
- February (2)
No comments:
Post a Comment